Gerald Celente with Jan Mickelson on WHO Radio – 23 September 2011 Trends Journal: www.trendsresearch.com Twitter: twitter.com/geraldcelente
23 Sep 2011 Subscribe to the Trends Journal today …
Gerald Celente with Jan Mickelson on WHO Radio – 23 September 2011 Trends Journal: www.trendsresearch.com Twitter: twitter.com/geraldcelente
23 Sep 2011 Subscribe to the Trends Journal today …
When the Student is Ready, the Answer will appear.
I have no background whatsoever in finance or economics. I am asking questions.
If no money have never been given by any bank, only debts for which more than
the capital must return to the bank,
how does some free money leak out as a pool of free circulating money?
Could it be because of bankrupcies liberating money, since this money is not returned to the bank?
If so, and if all the major banks are loosing money, how come there is not more free money around.
(We should have more available. In other words, where is the money?)
Is it because despite people are poorer, there are now many more people having money, I mean
India and China?
I ask questions because there must be a mechanism to introduce money to an increasing population.
With a loan, the returning interest reduces the free money pool. It does not put money into circulation.
Here, I think once a baby is born, we put about $50000 of debt over his head.
Why not give him an initial amount of money so he can play in the system like we do in the Monopoly game?
I wish Gerald Celente would explain the global flow of money.
Critics are fun but they give no in depth understanding of what is going on.
Thanks